|
Highlights
Inverse Problems and Invisibility
Submitted by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI)
In inverse problems one probes an object with a
particular type of field and measures the response. From these
measurements one aims to determine the object's properties or
geometrical structure. Typically, the interaction
is restricted to a bounded domain with boundary: a part
of the human body, the solid earth, the atmosphere, an airplane,
etc. Experiments can be carried out on the boundary, and the goal is
thus to infer information on the
domain's interior from the boundary measurements.
The mathematical techniques needed to study inverse problems are
diverse, and include ideas from the analysis of partial differential
equations, microlocal analysis, abstract and applied harmonic
analysis, complex analysis, integral geometry, differential geometry,
algebraic geometry, control theory, optimization, stochastic analysis,
and discrete mathematics. All of these played a part
in MSRI's Fall 2010 scientific program on
Inverse Problems and Applications.
Intriguing connections have been made between
inverse problems and invisibility—a subject of human
fascination for millennia, from the Greek legend of Perseus versus
Medusa to the more recent The Invisible Man and Harry Potter.
Since 2005 there has been a wave of serious theoretical
proposals in the physics literature for cloaking devices—structures
that would not only render an object invisible to light rays, but also
undetectable to finite-frequency electromagnetic waves. A proposal
that has received particular attention, because in principle it can cloak any
object of any shape and size, is that of Pendry and
coworkers.
It has been
referred to in the physics literature as transformation
optics. Essentially the same idea was formulated earlier
in electrostatics terms: a singular transformation is used to
blow up a point to a sphere, forming the boundary of the cloaked
region. Pushing forward a constant conductivity using this transformation
gives an anisotropic conductivity, whose currents have the behavior
illustrated in the figure to the right.
No current flows in the (inner) ball of radius 1, making this
region effectively invisible to boundary measurements. All the
electrostatics measurements made on the boundary of the ball of
radius 2 are the same as in the case of homogeneous conductivity.
Other constructions using transformations have been proposed; we
mention electromagnetic wormholes. The idea is to trick
electromagnetic waves to think they are going through a handle. Using
an electromagnetic wormhole one can create a secret connection between
two points in space. One knows the ‘input’ and can encode the
‘output’. The wormhole itself is invisible.
The blueprint of electromagnetic parameters used for cloaking has not
been found in nature. Indeed, there is a very active area of research
in metamaterials to construct cloaking devices. In a widely
reported experiment
this was
accomplished at microwave frequencies. As stated in Science, the
theoretical ideas for cloaking based on mathematical transformations
have produced and will produce a long shadow.
A. Greenleaf, M. Lassas and G. Uhlmann,
On nonuniqueness for Calderón's inverse problem,
Math. Res. Lett. 10 (2003), no. 5–6, 685–693.
U. Leonhardt,
Optical conformal mapping,
Science 312 (2006), no 5781, 1777–1780.
J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig and D. R. Smith,
Controlling electromagnetic fields,
Science 312 (2006), no. 5781, 1780–1782.
D. Schurig, J. Mock, B. Justice, S. Cummer, J. Pendry, A. Starr and D. Smith,
Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies,
Science 314 (2006), no. 5801, 977–980.
|